EQUINOX CORP
- NEW YORK, NY 10022-2429
- equinoxsensors.com (company website, opens in a new tab)
- Corporate Entity (Not Tax Exempt)
- SAM active
- No verified credentials yet
- CMMCNot on file
- SPRSNone
- FCLVisible to paid members
- Small Business
Registration and small-business types: SAM.gov, synced Nov 9, 2026. Compliance: self-attested by the company unless marked verified. The SPRS chip shows a range, never the exact score. How verification works
- 36-mo obligations
- $0
- Awards on record
- 1
- Contract vehicles
- 0
- Verified credentials
- 0
Compliance posture: unverified (SAM.gov baseline only)
EQUINOX CORP has not claimed this profile. What you see comes from public SAM.gov and USAspending records; no one from the company has confirmed CMMC, SPRS or clearance details yet. Learn more about CMMC 2.0
About EQUINOX CORP
- Headquarters
- NEW YORK, NY 10022-2429
Identifiers
UEI and CAGE come from SAM.gov. Other identifiers are listed by the company.
- UEIGQFNGZFLD8C6
- CAGE03MS9
Capabilities & differentiators
No capability narrative yet
Compliance posture
No compliance posture published yet
Facility clearance
Facility clearance: visible to paid members
Clearance levels are shown only to paying members; TeamingIndex does not advertise clearances (NISPOM 32 CFR 117.9). Learn more about facility clearances · Compare plans
Past performance
- 36-month obligations
- $0
- Awards on record
- 1
- Top funding agencies
- n/a
Awards
W31P4Q04CR199
Completed: Period of performance ended Sep 18, 2006Department of Defense · Department of the Army
- Obligated
- $750K
- Period of performance
- Jun 14, 2004 – Sep 18, 2006
| Award | Agency | NAICS · PSC | Obligated | Period of performance | Recompete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W31P4Q04CR199 | Department of Defense · Department of the Army | 541710 · AD92R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: OTHER (APPLIED RESEARCH/EXPLORATORY DEVELOPMENT) | $750K | Jun 14, 2004 – Sep 18, 2006 | Completed: Period of performance ended Sep 18, 2006 |
Contract vehicles
No contract vehicles on file
Proven teaming graph
No sub-award reports yet
Source: USAspending.gov sub-award reports (FSRS) (opens in a new tab) · sync date not recorded · Prime contractors report first-tier subcontracts of $30,000 or more. Amounts are reported sub-award values.
SBIR/STTR portfolio
SBIR/STTR awardee — Phase III-eligible for work derived from its SBIR/STTR projects
Agencies may award follow-on Phase III work without a new competition when it builds on this company’s earlier SBIR/STTR projects. Other work is competed as usual.
- Awards on record
- 24 awards
- Total awarded
- $8,982,195
- By phase
- SBIR Phase I: 13
- SBIR Phase II: 8
- STTR Phase I: 2
- STTR Phase II: 1
- By agency
- Department of Defense: 24
- Active projects
- 0 projects
- Projects whose contract end date is today or later.
- Phase II ending within 12 months
- 0 projects
- Phase II projects ending within 12 months. Agencies may award Phase III work without a new competition only when it derives from, extends or completes these projects.
- By year
- 2017: 1
- 2015: 1
- 2013: 1
- 2011: 1
- 2008: 1
- 2006: 2
- 2005: 2
- 2004: 4
- 2003: 3
- 2002: 2
- 2000: 4
- 1999: 1
- 1998: 1
Awards (most recent first)
Real-Time Camera-Independent Image Processing System For Long-Range Tactical Imaging Applications
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense (Army) · 2017 · $999,974
Jul 19, 2017 – Jul 18, 2019
Solicitation 2015.1 (2015) · Topic A15-026
Real-Time Camera-Independent Image Processing System For Long-Range Tactical Imaging Applications
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Army) · 2015 · $100,000
Sep 8, 2015 – Mar 7, 2016
Solicitation 2015.1 (2015) · Topic A15-026
Aimpoint Maintenance of Ground Targets by Airborne Laser Systems
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Air Force) · 2013 · $150,000
Sep 26, 2013 – Jun 23, 2014
Solicitation 2013.1 (2013) · Topic AF131-014 · Research partner: Stub
Neuro Cognitive Control of Human Machine Systems
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Navy) · 2011 · $100,000
Started Jan 20, 2011
Solicitation 2010.2 (2010) · Topic OSD10-CR2 · Research partner: Stub
A Compact, Low-Power, Low Cost Device for Stereoscopic 3D Viewing from a Single Sensor
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense (Army) · 2008 · $729,999
Oct 18, 2007 – Oct 31, 2009
Solicitation 2006.2 (2006) · Topic A06-067
A Compact, Low-Power, Low Cost Device for Stereoscopic 3D Viewing from a Single Sensor
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Army) · 2006 · $119,997
Nov 13, 2006 – Oct 31, 2007
Solicitation 2006.2 (2006) · Topic A06-067
Panoramically Panned Visible/LWIR Sensor with Target Motion Cueing
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense (Navy) · 2006 · $750,000
May 18, 2006 – Feb 18, 2009
Solicitation 2004.2 (2004) · Topic N04-171
Sensor for Simultaneous Movement and Directed Weapons Fire in All Light. Conditions
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense (Navy) · 2005 · $1,817,100
Jan 10, 2006 – Aug 15, 2010
Solicitation 2004.2 (2004) · Topic N04-155
Identifying Individuals at a Distance via Thermal Imaging of the Face
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Special Operations Command) · 2005 · $100,000
Dec 19, 2005 – Jun 19, 2006
Solicitation 2005.2 (2005) · Topic SOCOM05-007
Sensor for Simultaneous Movement and Directed Weapons Fire in All Light. Conditions
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Navy) · 2004 · $100,000
Nov 4, 2004 – Sep 20, 2005
Solicitation 2004.2 (2004) · Topic N04-155
Panoramically Panned Visible/LWIR Sensor with Target Motion Cueing
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Navy) · 2004 · $99,923
Oct 19, 2004 – Jan 19, 2006
Solicitation 2004.2 (2004) · Topic N04-171
A Motion-Based Approach to Automatic Target Recognition
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) · 2004 · $750,000
Aug 16, 2004 – Nov 20, 2006
Solicitation 2003.1 (2003) · Topic SB031-015
Intensified Night Vision Using Multiple Spectral Bands with Applications to Human Tracking
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense · 2004 · $750,000
Jun 14, 2004 – Sep 18, 2006
Solicitation 2002.1 (2002) · Topic SOCOM02-001
Image Fusion of Intensified and Thermal IR for Night Vision
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Army) · 2003 · $119,947
A Motion-Based Approach to Automatic Target Recognition
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) · 2003 · $99,000
Image Fusion of Intensified and Thermal IR for Night Vision
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense (Army) · 2003 · $730,000
Low-Cost Dual Visible/Thermal IR Camera System
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Navy) · 2002 · $70,000
Multi-Spectral Intensified Night Vision
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Special Operations Command) · 2002 · $100,000
Not Available
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) · 2000 · $99,000
Smarter Sensors Using Hybrid Multichip Camera Technology
SBIR Phase II · Department of Defense (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) · 2000 · $749,240
Not Available
STTR Phase I · Department of Defense (Air Force) · 2000 · $0
Research partner: JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Not Available
STTR Phase II · Department of Defense (Air Force) · 2000 · $251,343
Research partner: JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Smarter Sensors Using Hybrid Multichip Camera Technology
SBIR Phase I · Department of Defense (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) · 1999 · $98,495
Differential Geometric Tools for Visualizing and Understand
STTR Phase I · Department of Defense (Air Force) · 1998 · $98,177
Research partner: Johns Hopkins University
Source: SBIR.gov award data file (opens in a new tab) · as of Nov 12, 2026 · file published Nov 1, 2026
FedRAMP offerings
No FedRAMP Marketplace listing
Source: FedRAMP Marketplace (opens in a new tab) · sync date not recorded
Exclusions & screening
SAM.gov exclusions
Not yet checked against SAM.gov exclusions.
Agencies generally may not award to excluded parties, and primes may not subcontract with them above the threshold in FAR 52.209-6 (except COTS items) without a compelling reason reported to the contracting officer (FAR 9.405, 9.405-2). Some exclusion types apply only to specific programs: read the record on SAM.gov.
Source: SAM.gov Exclusions (opens in a new tab) · sync date not recorded
Consolidated Screening List
No confirmed match on the Consolidated Screening List (screened Nov 13, 2026).
The list combines Commerce, State and Treasury export-control and sanctions lists. A “no match” result is a name-and-address screen, not an export-compliance determination.
Source: ITA Consolidated Screening List (opens in a new tab) · as of Nov 13, 2026
GSA CALC+ rate benchmark
No GSA CALC+ rates on record
Source: GSA CALC+ awarded ceiling rates (opens in a new tab) · sync date not recorded
NAICS, PSC & socio-economic status
NAICS codes
- 541512Computer Systems Design ServicesPrimarySmall business under this code’s size standard
SAM.gov reports this entity as small under 1 of 1 NAICS code. Size is determined per code (SBA size standards).
Product & service codes (PSC)
No PSC codes reported.
Teaming preferences
This company has not published teaming preferences.
Business development contact
No BD contact published
Corporate hierarchy
No parent entity reported in SAM.gov.
SBA counts affiliates when it determines whether a business is small (13 CFR 121.103), so a parent’s size can matter for set-aside work.
Data sources & provenance
SAM.gov
Registration, CAGE, NAICS, socio-economic status, corporate hierarchy and exclusions. Last synced Nov 9, 2026.
USAspending.gov
Prime award history and obligations (FPDS), synced nightly.
The contractor
Nothing yet: this profile has not been claimed by the company.
TeamingIndex verification
Credentials marked Verified were checked by a TeamingIndex reviewer; everything else is self-attested.
Corrections
Corrections to SAM.gov data must be made in SAM.gov; TeamingIndex picks them up on the next nightly sync. Go to SAM.gov (opens in a new tab)
Machine-readable: capability.md schema.org JSON-LD embedded in this page.
Zero CUI: TeamingIndex stores verification metadata only, never System Security Plans, POA&Ms or DD Form 254s.
Teaming
Ready to team with EQUINOX CORP?
Send an introduction and propose a mutual NDA. Their team is notified right away, and you can share the capability statement with your capture team.